As far as the email server, Benghazi and the sale of access through the Clinton foundation, it seems to me that these are minor and that most politicians do those sorts of things. Way to much is stamped classified if the federal government and all the insiders know that and I am sure that all the insiders know that you do not every send anything that is important to keep secret through email.
Also my guess is that classification often is used to keep secrets from the voters.
I do not think Hillary Clinton is a bad person for doing this stuff BUT where and when do we start, and I think that we should start, punishing powerful politicians for breaking the laws they make and/or enforce?
We raise our politicians to high up. It is just a job and the President is much less important than most voters seem to thing. Further if the President is impeached it is not even the other party that takes over it is teh vice president and he gets to pick a new Vice President.
Regan should have been impeached for Iran contra, Bill Clinton for perjury, Obama for the 2014 prisoner swap.
You might think that we would be impeaching presidents all the time but we would not, after a few impeachments they would start to be more careful to not break the law and unlike the poor guys who break that law even with punishment do to poor impulse control the politically powerful mostly have great impulse control.
So why are people who would stand with Regan over Iran Contra so upset about Hillary's email server, a much smaller matter, I think mostly because they are against her for other reasons but are hoping that to take her out on a technicality.
I am against Hillary Clinton for her position on abortion. She has moved to a position on abortion where not
only does she want to keep it legal but she wants or tax dollars to be
used to pay for it. Democrats used to say that they wanted to make
abortion "safe, legal and rare", they have dropped the "and rare".
Hillary voted for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and if news
reports are to be believed, even after seeing chaos that ensued after
the war in Iraq, she pushed for arming rebels in Syria, pressuring
Egypt’s Government to give way and bombing of Libya. She is also a drug
warrior, late to support allowing the states to legalize marijuana.
Her position on equalizing pay by gender plus Government funding of daycare, on college tuition and trade are also bad but it seems most inteligent insiders seem to think that she is just lying about those policies. (BTW Here is an Idea by Steve Landsburg's on how to hold Politicians accountable for there promises.)
But it looks like she will win, so let’s hope that she learned some lessons and will get our military out of the middle east and legalize drugs.